Sexual Assault on campus Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Sexual Assault on campus - Research Paper Example2013). The rivalry continues on the critical topic because of the overlap that exists between theory and empirical research. There is much theory, exclusively little research has been done on the topic. For instance, there ar only a few enter studies on the effects of sexual assault (Exner & Cummings, 2011). The issue has been denied the attention it deserves akin other crimes in the campus environment. This opus will be at analyzing the controversy in sexual assault in campus and the different issues tie in to it.Sexual assault in campuses is a reality with women being the major victims of this vise. There exist studies exploring sexuality differences when it comes to sexual assault (Wilcox, Jordan & Pritchard, 2006). These studies have delivern that women in college are the main victims however, the effects are worse to males (Exner & Cummings, 2011). When males are sexually assaulted, the outcomes are severe because of the climate in campus where men have been empowered. Therefore, there is a controversy on the widely affected gender and the intensity of outcomes on the different genders.College populations are said to be major victims of sexual assault because they are in the age group that experiences most of the social activities and dating. by dating and the social activities, students end up being sexually assaulted by people close to them when they pretermit to satisfy their wants. According to Casey & Nurius (2006), sexual assault peaks at adolescence. This makes sexual assault to be more common in colleges than in the general population. Substance use is also common among college students (Hayes et al. 2013). This further increases the risk of victimisation by reducing the ability to ignore or resist unwanted advances.Statistics, on the other hand, show that a sexual assault in campus is at around 25% with women being major victims of this. Scholars like Casey & Nurius (2006) claim that th ese statistics do not give a real picture of the